Forest Engineering

University of Washington


 FM/FISH 328 Forestry-Fisheries Interactions

 

Assignment 3:

stream-fish

 

 

 

Reese Creek is located in the Nisqually Watershed in Lewis County, Washington USGS watershed 17110015.  It is located in Township 15, Range 6, Section 33 (Figures 1-4).   

 

Figure 1.  Nisqually watershed                      Figure 2.  Nisqually watershed within Washington State

17110015[1]17110015l[1]

Source:  http://cfpub.epa.gov/surf/huc.cfm?huc_code=17110015

 

Figure 3. Nisqually watershed (17110015)       Figure 4.  Lewis county

    in relationship to Lewis county                                                      

53041l[1]watershed map with county outline

 

Source:  http://cfpub.epa.gov/surf/county.cfm?fips_code=53041

 

Watershed Analysis Unit Location

Reese Creek is located in Department of Natural Resources Watershed Analysis Unit (WAU) 118.  The WAU name is Reese Creek.  WRIAN name is Nisqually, and Basin is designated as Glacier (Table 1).    pixel

*       

*      Source :  http://www3.wadnr.gov/dnrapp5/website/fpars/

 

Stream typing

Stream typing of Reese Creek by the DNR designates the main stem of Reese as a class three stream while its tributaries are class four and five in teh old system. The new system has teh mainstem as F and some of the tributaties as well. The other tributaries are labeled N, mainly because of stream gradient. You could pull that info from the contour map. On fish typing go to

http://www.dnr.wa.gov/BusinessPermits/Topics/ForestPracticesApplications/Pages/fp_watertyping.aspx

 

http://fortress.wa.gov/dnr/app1/fpars/viewer.htm This site provides all teh info you want. It is a web-based GIS system where you can select the appropriate info (zoom/pan/Info., etc). You can make teh WAU layer active and then click on teh WAU of interest and get the Query Table shown below for Reese Creek

 

You can get the water type breaks by making that layer active and you see where the breaks are located. You may have to zoom in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fish Barriers

Figure 4.  Topographic map of Reese Creek.  Stream types indicated, along with potential fish passage blockages.

 

Above is the old typing of the streams on the topographic map provided. I have used the water typing system outlined in WAC222-16 p. 18-23.  Under these State of Washington definitions type five streams are perennial (not indicated on our topographic map), and by definition of their perennial nature do provide fish habitat.  Type four streams are annual steams that are not fish habitat (board manual section 23).  Type three streams are streams not large enough to be class one or two but are fish habitat.

Source:  http://www.dnr.wa.gov/forestpractices/rules/

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 5.

Table_F_6_Fish

Source:  http://courses.washington.edu/fm328/lectures/5-week/week_5/Table_F_6_Fish.jpg

 

 

In addition, the other stream typing system used by DNR can be converted to below:

 

Figure 6.

Source:   WAC222-16 Definitions

 

Fish Species

Type three fish use and reach, and type four and five presumed fish absence is determined using first the primary definition of stream structure and flow throughout the year, then confirmed using methods within the Forest Practices Board Manual Section 13:  Guidelines for Determining Fish Use for the Purpose of Typing Waters.  Fish surveys and field verification are used to determine water type breaks between types three and four waters.  Non-fish habitat can be assumed from last survey if gradient increases remain above 20% (Figure 5). 

Source:  http://www.dnr.wa.gov/forestpractices/board/manual/

 

To get an estimate of fish habitat reach from the topographic map we can estimate the gradient from the contours.  The habitat breaks in Reese Creek occur from class three to class four as the gradient increases from <20% to greater than 20%.  This can be used as an estimate of fish reach.

 

Two major potential fish barriers that are not located within Reese Creek WAU are the LaGrand and Alder dams.  These dams do not have fish ladders.  But, as history has it, these dams do not actually serve as fish barriers because “A waterfall prevented anadromous (migrating) steelhead and salmon from traveling upstream of the LaGrande area before the Nisqually River Project dams were built.”

Source:  http://www.ci.tacoma.wa.us/power/parksandpower/nisqually/natural_resources/fisheries_programs.htm

 

Figure 7.

Nisqually_map

Source:  http://www.ci.tacoma.wa.us/power/parksandpower/nisqually/map.htm

 

Therefore, there are no anadromous fish in Reese Creek. 

 

Although there are no anadromous fish, there is potential for non-anadromous fishes to inhabit Reese Creek.  These species include kokanee. “Each year, Tacoma Power plants up to 500,000 kokanee in Alder Lake to provide angling opportunities for visitors. Kokanee are landlocked sockeye salmon that live in Alder Lake for 2 to 3 years before spawning in area streams.  Tacoma Power began stocking kokanee in Alder Lake in 1999, although historically plants took place in Alder Lake in 1950s.” 

Source: http://www.ci.tacoma.wa.us/power/parksandpower/nisqually/natural_resources/fisheries_programs.htm

 

Other fish that potentially use Reese Creek as spawning or rearing habitat include other stream type fish that do not require anadromy in their life cycle like sculpin and dase.    

 

Culvert Status

The Forest Practices regulations (WAC 222-24 – Road Construction and Maintenance) require that all permanent culverts, regardless of fish passage status, must be able to pass a 100 year flood event if a harvest permit is to be issued to a private land owner.  Therefore, depending on the status of the culvert at HAP-18-78, it could need to be replaced to meet requirements of fish passage (kokanee) and 100 year flood events as outlines below.

Source:  http://www.dnr.wa.gov/forestpractices/rules/

 

*(3) Culvert installation for Type Np and Ns Waters. In addition to applicable general

provisions above, installation, maintenance and removal of permanent culverts in or across

Type Np and Ns Waters are subject to the following provisions:

(a) All permanent culverts must be designed to pass the 100-year flood event with

consideration for the passage of debris likely to be encountered.

(b) The culvert and its associated embankments and fills must have sufficient erosion

protection to withstand the 100-year flood event. Erosion protection may include

armored overflows or the use of clean coarse fill material.

I If the department determines that because of unstable slopes the culvert size shown in

the board manual, section 3, “Determining Culvert Size, Method A” would be

inadequate to protect public resources, it may require a larger culvert designed using

generally accepted engineering principles that meet the standards in (a) and (b) of this

subsection.

(d) No permanent culverts shall be installed that are smaller than:

(i) 24 inches for Type Np Waters.

(ii) 18 inches for Type Ns Waters in western Washington.

(iii) 15 inches for Type Ns Waters in eastern Washington.

(e) The alignment and slope of the culvert shall parallel the natural flow of the stream

whenever possible.

(f) Culverts must be designed and installed so they will not cause scouring of the stream

bed and erosion of the banks in the vicinity of the project.

(g) When the department determines that installing a culvert in a flowing stream will

result in excessive siltation and turbidity, and siltation and turbidity would be reduced

if stream flow were diverted, the department shall require the stream flow be diverted

using a bypass flume or culvert, or by pumping the stream flow around the work area.

This may include culvert installations that are within 0.25 miles of a Type S or F

Water or within two miles of a hatchery intake in consultation with the department of

fish and wildlife.

(h) Fill associated with culvert installation must have sufficient erosion protection to

withstand the 100-year flood.

(i) Stream beds shall be cleared for a distance of 50 feet upstream from the culvert inlet

of such slash or debris that reasonably may be expected to plug the culvert.

(j) The entrance of all culverts shall have adequate catch basins and headwalls to

minimize the possibility of erosion or fill failure.

 

Therefore, because there is potential for fish movement across the culvert located near survey point HAP-81-78, we need to make sure this structure is adequate to permit fish passage, even if the river downstream river is impassible to anadromous fishes.  Also, we need to calculate the 100 year flood event at this culvert:

 

Q100 Calculations for Reese Creek drainage above HAP-81-78

Source:  http://www.dnr.wa.gov/forestpractices/watershedanalysis/manual/hydrology.pdf

 

Region II 100 year flood event

Q100(II) = 0.194 *  (2.7mi2) (0.86) * 77.67 in (1.60) * 1

Q100(II) = 0.194 * 2.35* 1057.80

Q100(II) = 482.25 cfs

 

            Region II 5 year flood event

            Q5(II) = 0.140 * (2.7mi2)(0.86) *   77.67 in(1.53) * 1

            Q5(II) = 0.140 * 2.35 * 779.99

            Q5(II) = 256.62 cfs

 

Average Yearly precipitation in LaGrande, 21 miles west of Reese Creek is 38.52 inches

Average Yearly precipitation at Rainier Paradise, 22 miles east is 116.82 inches

Source:  http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?walagr

Source:  http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?warain

 

Since Reese Creek drainage is half way between these two precipitation stations, we can estimate the WAU precipitation at about 77.67 in/yr.

 

The area of the watershed was determined using an acreage dot grid with a known map scale.

 

 

 

 

Fish Barrier Identification

 

A fish passage barrier is any man made sturcture that obstructs the movement of fish above or below the area in question[1].  This applies to fish of any species.  Types of fish that you may encounter in a stream in Washington State include salmonid spp. , sculpin spp., dase spp., or lamprey[2].  A fish passage barrier is an obstruction that occurs at any season, or any life stage of any fish.  This means that even when a stream is low due to lack of rainfall or seasonal variation; it must be passable by fish to be considered a non-barrier.  In addition, we must consider passage at every life stage.  The ability of a coho salmon fry to maneuver against the current is much different from the abilities of a coho adult, or a sculpin adult.  Therefore, we must design every fish passage for the smallest to the largest life history phase in the least hospitable seasonal water conditions for each species.  This will ensure that the structure will not serve as a fish barrier.

 

Fish barriers block fish passages in three major ways.  First, the structure could create a physical barrier between the upper and lower portions of the stream or river, like a dam or a hanging culvert.  Secondly, a barrier could simply be a structure that creates velocities which fish cannot swim upstream against due to body size and/or stamina, like a spillway or culvert.  Lastly, a fish barrier could be an area where a fish cannot pass due to the unnatural structure of the stream bed substrate.

 

When surveying for fish passage barriers start looking in fish bearing streams.  Fish bearing streams are usually perennial steams that are three feet or wider in Western Washington, and two feet or wider in Eastern Washington[3].  These streams have the potential of providing habitat for fish.  In addition to perennial streams, we must also consider annual streams or wetland areas.  This is because different species of fish move between different habitat types in various life history stages.  For example, coho salmon can move from the stream where they were spawned at to intermittent wetlands where they will rear during the winter season[4].

 

Examples of man made structures that are commonly or potential fish passage barriers include dams, fords, weirs, spillways, and culverts that divert water under roads or trails.  Culverts are probably the most common fish barrier because they are so numerous and necessary for road construction.  Figure 8 demonstrates several ways a culvert can be a barrier[5].  When approaching a culvert, bridge, or other structure, think about the three ways that fish passage can be impeded.  First, is there are physical barrier that very small or very large fish could not pass through?  What if the water was flowing higher or lower, more or less rapidly?  Secondly, look to see if the velocity of the water would allow a baby fish less than one inch long to swim up stream.  Lastly, look to see if the substrate or the structure, in combination with the velocity would allow small and large fishes of various species to pass through.  If you answer no to any of these questions the structure is a fish passage barrier. 

 

Figure 8. 

 

Source:  http://www.dnr.wa.gov/sflo/fffpp/fffppbrochure12-29-04.pdf

 

 

 

 

 



[1] http://www.dnr.wa.gov/forestpractices/board/manual/section3.pdf

[2] Lamb, A., and P. Edgell. 1986. Coastal Fishes of the Pacific Northwest. Harbor Publ. Co. Ltd. Madeira park: British Columbia.

[4] Groot, C. and L. Margolis (editors). 1991. Pacific Salmon Life Histories. Univ. of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, B.C.